Stargate Worlds Game Site | Game FAQ | Community Forums | Command Forums | Dev Post Tracker

Go Back   Stargate Worlds Game Forums > Stargate Worlds MMO Discussion > Stargate Worlds General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Post New Thread Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-13-2007, 08:16 AM   #1
FreejackeR
 
FreejackeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Newcastle, England.
Default Developer Q&A episode 5

Hey Guys,

While am transcribing it, you guys can download it and post your thoughts on the questions asked

FreejackeR -out.

btw its here :

http://www.stargateworlds.com/download/10/683/
__________________

Last edited by FreejackeR : 12-13-2007 at 08:22 AM.
FreejackeR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 08:19 AM   #2
FreejackeR
 
FreejackeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Newcastle, England.
Default

ME?

Am very please with the questions, the Quality of the Answers and the Quality of the Podcast allot better and clearer to transcribe, loved the info on Norad hehe , and interesting about the Gao'uld symboite transferring, I also liked the Asgard answers and left me thinking about it how this will be explained just what i think we all wanted answers but also room to think and expand with our own thoughts, Gun modding ahhh yeah that's where its at! can wait for that

Totally think the answer on Tolana world no Crystals!!!! hehe Outstanding guys.

FreejackeR -out.

The question about the in guild character customization to me mean you will be able to give them new uniforms or Armour colours or more flamboyant outfits which could be Amazing!! hehe cool...

Keep it up CME!!! nice work guys.
__________________
FreejackeR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 08:58 AM   #3
Jeff Westen
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Default

I found it to be disappointing that the number of ranks is only 8 in a command. That is what too few. Setting it to the number of ranks in the USAF would have been more logical.
__________________
AKA: Smooth Criminal
Jeff Westen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 09:08 AM   #4
Saber
 
Saber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New York
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlad Cole View Post
I found it to be disappointing that the number of ranks is only 8 in a command. That is what too few. Setting it to the number of ranks in the USAF would have been more logical.
For Tau'ri it is logical, Gould... not so much lol. They are probably making them universal for all races.
__________________
Saber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 09:18 AM   #5
Jeff Westen
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saber View Post
For Tau'ri it is logical, Gould... not so much lol. They are probably making them universal for all races.
Well not really. You can allow up to 20+ ranks but that doesn't mean you have to use them.
__________________
AKA: Smooth Criminal
Jeff Westen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 10:00 AM   #6
JPoole
 
JPoole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Gilbert, Az
Default

Vlad,

If you have too many ranks in a guild structure, some of the ranks tend to get a bit watered down. But, if we feel the players need/want more ranks we will certainly look at adding them.
__________________
Jim Poole
System Designer
"When you can't run anymore, you crawl...
And when you can't do that, you find someone to carry you."
JPoole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 10:22 AM   #7
Pluto
 
Pluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Default

all in all i think this is one of the best Q/A that i have heard, the questions where good...and the answers where great. now i want to hear more about the guild system....haha.
Pluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 10:23 AM   #8
AJZ
Community Assistant
Community Assistant
 
AJZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Default

I thought this Q&A was fantastic. Is it just me or do the answers to our questions keep getting more indepth!?! I thought pretty much each question got answered fully with no shadowing around the answers.

The only downside for me was word about only 8 ranks for commands.
I'd have to agree with Vlad, I'd like to see more ranks added if even just solely for an rp purpose. Ideally I'd like to see 'atleast' 15 ranks.

I know Vlad and I run commands which use almost idenitical military strutucre (give or take 1 rank). We have people's time invested into certain ranks and even some members join commands knowing they just want to make it to colonel and they'd be content. It would stink to not be able to assign our members those ranks in my opinion.

Other then that trying to guess what Jim was hinting to at the end there. Perhaps that ability to assign command personnel to specific SG groups? I think I may have just guessed your secret Mr. Poole (Or I hope so at least)
AJZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 11:12 AM   #9
Jayna
 
Jayna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: P3X-888
Default

I thought overall that this was the best Q&A podcast.

However, the answer to my question did not thrill me but that doesnt take away from the professionalism and effort that the team put into the podcast

Go team!

I still have one question about my answer thought, 200 hours to end cap is comparable to "modern mmorpgs"

Which ones?
__________________
Just say NO to the Warcraft static storyline and YES to the Asheron's Call model where things change, end and progress.
Jayna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 12:37 PM   #10
Good Luck
 
Good Luck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The sands of Florida
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPoole View Post
Vlad,

If you have too many ranks in a guild structure, some of the ranks tend to get a bit watered down. But, if we feel the players need/want more ranks we will certainly look at adding them.
8 MAY be a bit small, at least it seems so atm (to us that aren't playing)
I could see it going to 10 ranks without the lower ones being watered down imo
Good Luck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 12:55 PM   #11
Darkstar
 
Darkstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Default

Great job once again on the Q&A! Always a pleasure to listen to them and find out what kind of goodies are in store.

I did like the fact that there will be options to respec your characters, and develop them beyond reaching the level gap. To me that keeps a game interesting.

As for the rank system, 8 ranks is not bad. Having less amount of ranks, means the ranks will have more significance. Nothing wrong wit having more than 8 ranks, don't get me wrong on that aspect.

I did enjoy the part about the crystals on tolana, thought it was rather amusing .

The last question did perk my interest on what other kinds of customization that is available for a guild.
__________________


"Those that brave the unkown are sometimes called fools.
However, the truly foolish are those that do not."


Check us out at
www.stargategamingclan.com

Last edited by Darkstar : 12-13-2007 at 12:57 PM.
Darkstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 12:57 PM   #12
RedLynk
 
RedLynk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southern California
Default

'Twas good and informative.

- RedLynk
__________________

[10:26] <@CME_BizarroDerek> !8 will redlynk be booted from irc?
[10:26] <@ChanServ> CME_BizarroDerek: Yes.
[10:27] *** you were kicked from #Stargate-Worlds by CME_BizarroDerek (RedLynk)
RedLynk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 02:24 PM   #13
Jeff Westen
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPoole View Post
Vlad,

If you have too many ranks in a guild structure, some of the ranks tend to get a bit watered down. But, if we feel the players need/want more ranks we will certainly look at adding them.
Awesome

And this is why this community is the best!
__________________
AKA: Smooth Criminal
Jeff Westen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 02:27 PM   #14
Spaceman
 
Spaceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I dont know. You Tell Me
Default

Pretty Cool! I enjoyed it.
__________________
Spaceman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 03:27 PM   #15
chazruby
 
chazruby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kansas, USA, North America, Earth, Sol System, Milky Way Galaxy, The Known Universe
Default

Great Q and A. Learns lots. Heres hoping we can fight in the water treatment plant in Cheyenne mountain. I think 8 guild names is more than enough you only really have to have 3. a leader, officers and recruits
__________________

Said by Captain Underpants: Sorry, I have to ask: are you a salmon?
chazruby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 03:37 PM   #16
Jeff Westen
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chazruby View Post
I think 8 guild names is more than enough you only really have to have 3. a leader, officers and recruits
Well maybe that it enough for your command, but for us, and other military commands, 8 is no enough.
__________________
AKA: Smooth Criminal
Jeff Westen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 04:09 PM   #17
DOAM
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayna View Post
I thought overall that this was the best Q&A podcast.

However, the answer to my question did not thrill me but that doesnt take away from the professionalism and effort that the team put into the podcast

Go team!

I still have one question about my answer thought, 200 hours to end cap is comparable to "modern mmorpgs"

Which ones?


Well that depends on what your deffinition of "is" is... er, I mean, what your deffinition of "comparable" is.

CoH is like 100 hours... and thats if you just don't even try, and somehow accidently stumble upon the lvl cap. But CoH is by far the easiest I've heard of. And is "the" game for altaholics. There is almost no content in the game, beyond that which gets you to the level cap. It's all about making new characters and trying new things.


In WoW, my latest character (the only one started since BC came out, thus the only one that I can accurately count the time one) is at roughly 9 days /played and he's 65 (cap is 70). Most likely will hit 70 at 12 or 13 days. Which would be 288-312 hours. I wouldn't call that comparable... but it's certainly not that far off. Plus they (CME) have said they'd be adding new content very often. So, longer than CoH but with far more content. Shorter than WoW, but (probably?) more content.


I can live with that. If it's accurate.

Edit: Bah, forgot the main reason I was gonna post!

The QA was nice, I guess. Some nifty things to learn, but I'd prefer some harder hitting questions. And the statement to the effect of "Everyone likes being little gray men!" (not actual quote) made me wanna step on a puppy. Because no... no I don't. Not at all. Dev's shouldn't be allowed to have thought processes like that. Just because it's fun to you, and your friends, and your friends friends, doesn't mean it's fun for the majority. Just the majority of the people you know. Which is the minority of the entirety. Hmm. Yeah that makes sense. To me anyway. Sounds cool, at least.

Oh, and need more guild ranks. Let the players set the number of ranks in their guild. Let us decide when the ranks are too watered down. We're the ones using them, after all.

Last edited by DOAM : 12-13-2007 at 04:16 PM.
DOAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 05:32 PM   #18
Xenomorph
 
Xenomorph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oregon, USA
Talking

I agree with some that this was the best Q & A, because it had my question in it! W00t to the Devs for this podcast, and as to Stargate Command not being entirly accesdable, that is totally understandable; who would want to go to a water treatment level? But I do hope that we can you through that long tunnel in the base, go down the elevator, explore the infimiry, possibly use the emerengcy exits (the ladders). I am not sure though if it'll be cannon if a bunch of Asgards are running around the SGC. It would be amusing if we could go to the mess hall and order something to eat, and it would restore health or power [mana].
__________________
Xenomorph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 05:45 PM   #19
Penguin
 
Penguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Default

It seems that the devs are only giving out information on mechanics that will be in SGW that are in other MMO's, or stuff that is already known or what-have-you.

They keep hinting at all this "revolutionary" stuff, but they won't tell. I know they need to save stuff for release, but it would be nice to find out about what's going to make the game new exciting and different than other MMO's.

Other than that I found the comments on the Asgard a little interesting. The way that the fellow put an intonation on the words "these Asgard" would seem to suggest that the playable Asgard in the game are of a different faction or sub-faction to the Asgard in the show.

So this leaves me with this question: Is CME's solution for canon problems just to invent a completely new and unheard of faction? With the OP-CORE, Goa'uld and now possibly the Asgard what's next? The free Jaffa? The SGC? NPC factions?

With all this new unheard of storytelling Why don't you guys just come out and say that the game is set in a alternate storyline to the series, that you've just been inspired by the storyline of the show?
__________________

Vice Chancellor of Scientia est Licentia, a science and archeology focussed guild, check out our forum or website.
Penguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 10:01 PM   #20
Jayna
 
Jayna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: P3X-888
Default

Quote:
With all this new unheard of storytelling Why don't you guys just come out and say that the game is set in a alternate storyline to the series, that you've just been inspired by the storyline of the show?
Cause they would get crucified by the canonophiles.

"i want to play in the TV SHOW universe, not some OTHER universe"

I really wished they would break down look at the facts and say hmm, we had to make too many changes to create the game we cant walk the fence anymore, alt universe.

They could even write an entire Atlantis script about it, McCay breaks into the Game Universe.
__________________
Just say NO to the Warcraft static storyline and YES to the Asheron's Call model where things change, end and progress.

Last edited by Jayna : 12-14-2007 at 12:03 PM.
Jayna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 10:59 PM   #21
Loheat
 
Loheat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Noxen, PA Command: 1st Renegade Battalion
Default

Back to the ranks thing, will the 8 or so ranks have the same names for every guild, would they be race dependant or will each guild be able choose. It seems to me that the devs are going for a universal system for guild ranking and Im not sure how that will incorprate with a human guild vs a goauld ro a jaffa guild. I certainly wouldnt want my asgared guy running around as a private.
Loheat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 06:26 AM   #22
Liliane
 
Liliane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayna View Post
Cause they would get crucified by the canonophiles.
More like because we can crucify them, because we have base for it.

Quote:
"i want to play in the TV SHOW universe, not some OTHER universe"
I don't think this is true, more like, if You say it's the show, then don't say it's not. I think the point is more about telling lie or truth, than what it is.

Example if You say this mmorpg is about superman, then I except it to be that. So, if it's not about superman, then You have lied to me.

I think You get the picture.

CME did choose SG1 series as they mmorpg base. They did not say they make invented sci-fi mmorpg. They have sayed they try to follow actual SG1 series atmosphere and canon. So of cause people who care about the canon, does want it to be in canon. So, it's not really anyting else than telling the truth really.
__________________
Account: Liliane
Explorer 86.67%, Socializer 73.33%, Achiever 40.00%, Killer 0.00%
Read SGW FAQ and Wiki for more information.
Liliane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 08:03 AM   #23
Rryst
 
Rryst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Aus
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayna View Post
Cause they would get crucified by the canonophiles.

"i want to play in the TV SHOW universe, not some OTHER universe"
How is that restricted to the so called canonophiles? There's plenty of poeple who certainly wouldn't call themselve canonophiles that don't want to be playing in some cheap copy of the original universe.
__________________
Rryst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 09:44 AM   #24
Liliane
 
Liliane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rryst View Post
How is that restricted to the so called canonophiles? There's plenty of poeple who certainly wouldn't call themselve canonophiles that don't want to be playing in some cheap copy of the original universe.
Are You saying the orginal universe is cheap?
__________________
Account: Liliane
Explorer 86.67%, Socializer 73.33%, Achiever 40.00%, Killer 0.00%
Read SGW FAQ and Wiki for more information.
Liliane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2007, 09:53 AM   #25
The Scarab
 
The Scarab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bozeman, Montana
Default

I actually enjoyed it very much.

It puts a smile on my face when the developers want to talk about deeper aspects of the game, but they are not allowed to in the QnA sessions. THAT shows me that the game is going to be unique and exciting, because if a developer gets excited about it, players should have no reason NOT to get excited about it.
__________________

------------------------
Beta ID: Soundwalker
The Scarab is offline   Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Stargate WorldsCheyenne Mountain Entertainment FireSkyStargate SG-1Stargate AtlantisMetro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc.

Cheyenne Mountain EntertainmentTM is a trademark or registered trademark of Cheyenne Mountain Entertainment, Inc. in the U.S. and/or other countries. Stargate SG-1, STARGATE ATLANTIS, and STARGATE WORLDS are trademarks of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. All rights reserved. All other trademarks or tradenames are the property of their respective owners. Statements herein concerning future events and developments and the Company's expectations, beliefs, plans and estimates constitute forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Cheyenne's actual results could differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking information.

Stargate SG-1 TM and © 1997 — 2006 Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. All rights reserved.